Which concept occurs when the principal later approves an unauthorized act, making it binding?

Study for the Legal Cases on Agency, Fiduciary Duty, and Corporate Governance Test. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Prepare effectively for your exam!

Multiple Choice

Which concept occurs when the principal later approves an unauthorized act, making it binding?

Explanation:
Ratification is the concept at work here: when a principal later approves an unauthorized act by their agent, the act becomes binding on the principal as if the agent had authority from the start. The retroactive effect happens because the principal, by ratifying, adopts the act and accepts the resulting obligations toward the third party. For ratification to occur, the principal must know the material facts of what was done and intend to adopt it; ratification can be explicit or inferred from conduct, such as accepting the benefits or acting in a way that treats the act as approved. Once ratified, the principal bears the contract, and the agent is generally shielded from liability to the third party for lack of authority, though the agent could face other consequences if there was a separate breach of duty. This differs from apparent authority, which depends on the third party’s reasonable belief based on the principal’s representations, and from estoppel or the broader agency relationship, which cover different doctrines.

Ratification is the concept at work here: when a principal later approves an unauthorized act by their agent, the act becomes binding on the principal as if the agent had authority from the start. The retroactive effect happens because the principal, by ratifying, adopts the act and accepts the resulting obligations toward the third party. For ratification to occur, the principal must know the material facts of what was done and intend to adopt it; ratification can be explicit or inferred from conduct, such as accepting the benefits or acting in a way that treats the act as approved. Once ratified, the principal bears the contract, and the agent is generally shielded from liability to the third party for lack of authority, though the agent could face other consequences if there was a separate breach of duty. This differs from apparent authority, which depends on the third party’s reasonable belief based on the principal’s representations, and from estoppel or the broader agency relationship, which cover different doctrines.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy